From 2bb71424636fba7944b36b1689e9df22a53f1a3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:58:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up forwprop-39.c testcase [PR109145] As written in the PR, newlib headers aren't C11 compliant in that they don't define CMPLXF macro, and glibc before 2.16 doesn't define that either. I think it is easier to use __builtin_complex directly, over another patch which keeps including complex.h but defines CMPLXF if it isn't defined, we want to test how forwprop behaves rather than what complex.h defines or doesn't define. 2023-03-17 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR testsuite/109145 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c: Remove -std=c11 from dg-options. Don't include complex.h. (foo): Use __builtin_complex rather than CMPLXF. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c index eb2930e77fd4..232f409452c4 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c @@ -1,14 +1,12 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-std=c11 -O2 -fdump-tree-forwprop1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ - -#include <complex.h> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-forwprop1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ extern void push1(void *p, float _Complex x); void foo (void *q, float _Complex *x) { float r = __real *x; float i = __imag *x; - push1 (q, CMPLXF (r, i)); + push1 (q, __builtin_complex (r, i)); } /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "COMPLEX_EXPR" "forwprop1" } } */ -- GitLab