From 7dde02e9efc9d7ecd87814f4c8ee803ef005a7fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:00:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Add tail_call effective target
The RTL "expand" dump is the first RTL dump, and it also appears to be
the earliest trace of the target having implemented sibcalls.
Including the "," in the pattern searched for, to try and avoid
possible false matches, but there doesn't appear to be any identifiers
or target names nearby so this is just belts and suspenders. Using
"tail_call" as a shorter and more commonly used term than a derivative
of "sibling calls", and expecting only gcc folks to have heard of
"sibcalls".
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_tail_call): New.
---
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 4236c920baeb..4bad4dae582f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -11680,6 +11680,15 @@ proc check_effective_target_frame_pointer_for_non_leaf { } {
return 0
}
+# Return 1 if the target can perform tail-call optimizations of the
+# most trivial type.
+proc check_effective_target_tail_call { } {
+ return [check_no_messages_and_pattern tail_call ",SIBCALL" rtl-expand {
+ __attribute__((__noipa__)) void foo (void) { }
+ __attribute__((__noipa__)) void bar (void) { foo(); }
+ } {-O2 -fdump-rtl-expand-all}] ;# The "SIBCALL" note requires a detailed dump.
+}
+
# Return 1 if the target's calling sequence or its ABI
# create implicit stack probes at or prior to function entry.
proc check_effective_target_caller_implicit_probes { } {
--
GitLab