From 93c7168800d48c3b05910109163ce0b603241ee9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:38:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Fix spelling.
2010-01-04 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
* trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Fix spelling.
From-SVN: r155607
---
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index c033b6eadadb..24b258d87e1b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2010-01-04 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
+
+ * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Fix spelling.
+
2010-01-04 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/41872
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
index f93cc9f2caec..ce33b2abc19c 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ gfc_finish_var_decl (tree decl, gfc_symbol * sym)
gfortran would typically put them in either the BSS or
initialized data segments, and only mark them as common if
they were part of common blocks. However, if they are not put
- into common space, then C cannot initialize global fortran
+ into common space, then C cannot initialize global Fortran
variables that it interoperates with and the draft says that
either Fortran or C should be able to initialize it (but not
both, of course.) (J3/04-007, section 15.3). */
@@ -3188,7 +3188,7 @@ gfc_trans_deferred_vars (gfc_symbol * proc_sym, tree fnbody)
|| (sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS
&& sym->ts.u.derived->components->attr.allocatable))
{
- /* Nullify and automatic deallocatation of allocatable scalars. */
+ /* Nullify and automatic deallocation of allocatable scalars. */
tree tmp;
gfc_expr *e;
gfc_se se;
--
GitLab