From a86ca83a1b1817457837540e0bc8dd26db75407c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:08:10 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Remove redundant sentence about modules being in C++20
As C++20 has already been published, we don't need to link to the draft
(which is now the C++23 draft anyway). And there's no need to say it's
part of the C++20 spec, or that there might be defect reports. That's
true for everything in C++20, so calling it out here just for Modules
isn't needed.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi (C++ Modules): Remove anachronism.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 248ed534aee4..b01ffab566af 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -34151,9 +34151,7 @@ provides a modular compilation system, intending to provide both
faster builds and better library isolation. The ``Merging Modules''
paper @uref{https://wg21.link/p1103}, provides the easiest to read set
of changes to the standard, although it does not capture later
-changes. That specification is now part of C++20,
-@uref{git@@github.com:cplusplus/draft.git}, it is considered complete
-(there may be defect reports to come).
+changes.
@emph{G++'s modules support is not complete.} Other than bugs, the
known missing pieces are:
--
GitLab