From ac3f5df7092b9b99f6eb4a403b206ef0b47d4af1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:17:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] builtins.c (expand_builtin_apply_args_1): Call force_operand on plus_constant result. * builtins.c (expand_builtin_apply_args_1) [STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD]: Call force_operand on plus_constant result. From-SVN: r75306 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/builtins.c | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 227149518a9a..7187c9116dec 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2004-01-01 Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> + + * builtins.c (expand_builtin_apply_args_1) [STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD]: + Call force_operand on plus_constant result. + 2004-01-01 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> * expmed.c (store_bit_field, extract_bit_field): Use new named patterns diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c index c5af18d7182c..df93f48238e6 100644 --- a/gcc/builtins.c +++ b/gcc/builtins.c @@ -1128,8 +1128,11 @@ expand_builtin_apply_args_1 (void) tem = copy_to_reg (virtual_incoming_args_rtx); #ifdef STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD /* We need the pointer as the caller actually passed them to us, not - as we might have pretended they were passed. */ - tem = plus_constant (tem, current_function_pretend_args_size); + as we might have pretended they were passed. Make sure it's a valid + operand, as emit_move_insn isn't expected to handle a PLUS. */ + tem + = force_operand (plus_constant (tem, current_function_pretend_args_size), + NULL_RTX); #endif emit_move_insn (adjust_address (registers, Pmode, 0), tem); -- GitLab