From e489464acf5541e6fdb4007c49266193cc93d16e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:25:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Rewrite more refs for epilogue vectorization
The following makes sure to rewrite all gather/scatter detected by
dataref analysis plus stmts classified as VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER. Maybe
we need to rewrite all refs, the following covers the cases I've
run into now.
* tree-vect-loop.cc (update_epilogue_loop_vinfo): Rewrite
both STMT_VINFO_GATHER_SCATTER_P and VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER
stmt refs.
---
gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index 8877ebde2466..4a8b0a18800e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -11361,8 +11361,12 @@ update_epilogue_loop_vinfo (class loop *epilogue, tree advance)
/* Data references for gather loads and scatter stores do not use the
updated offset we set using ADVANCE. Instead we have to make sure the
reference in the data references point to the corresponding copy of
- the original in the epilogue. */
- if (STMT_VINFO_GATHER_SCATTER_P (vect_stmt_to_vectorize (stmt_vinfo)))
+ the original in the epilogue. Make sure to update both
+ gather/scatters recognized by dataref analysis and also other
+ refs that get_load_store_type classified as VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER. */
+ auto vstmt_vinfo = vect_stmt_to_vectorize (stmt_vinfo);
+ if (STMT_VINFO_MEMORY_ACCESS_TYPE (vstmt_vinfo) == VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER
+ || STMT_VINFO_GATHER_SCATTER_P (vstmt_vinfo))
{
DR_REF (dr)
= simplify_replace_tree (DR_REF (dr), NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE,
@@ -11371,9 +11375,6 @@ update_epilogue_loop_vinfo (class loop *epilogue, tree advance)
= simplify_replace_tree (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dr), NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE,
&find_in_mapping, &mapping);
}
- else
- gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_MEMORY_ACCESS_TYPE (vect_stmt_to_vectorize (stmt_vinfo))
- != VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER);
DR_STMT (dr) = STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_vinfo);
stmt_vinfo->dr_aux.stmt = stmt_vinfo;
/* The vector size of the epilogue is smaller than that of the main loop
--
GitLab