Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
G
gcc-cobol
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
COBOLworx
gcc-cobol
Commits
16d1b0bd
Commit
16d1b0bd
authored
20 years ago
by
Paul Brook
Committed by
Paul Brook
20 years ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C: XFAIL on arm*-*-eabi.
From-SVN: r87712
parent
4d539f68
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+4
-0
4 additions, 0 deletions
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C
+1
-1
1 addition, 1 deletion
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C
with
5 additions
and
1 deletion
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+
4
−
0
View file @
16d1b0bd
2004-09-18 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C: XFAIL on arm*-*-eabi.
2004-09-18 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
2004-09-18 Joseph S. Myers <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
PR c/17424
PR c/17424
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/static11.C
+
1
−
1
View file @
16d1b0bd
...
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
...
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
// in their dejagnu baseboard description) require that the status is
// in their dejagnu baseboard description) require that the status is
// final when exit is entered (or main returns), and not "overruled" by a
// final when exit is entered (or main returns), and not "overruled" by a
// destructor calling _exit. It's not really worth it to handle that.
// destructor calling _exit. It's not really worth it to handle that.
// { dg-do run { xfail mmix-knuth-mmixware xtensa-*-elf* arm*-*-elf } }
// { dg-do run { xfail mmix-knuth-mmixware xtensa-*-elf* arm*-*-elf
arm*-*-eabi
} }
// Bug: g++ was failing to destroy C<int>::a because it was using two
// Bug: g++ was failing to destroy C<int>::a because it was using two
// different sentry variables for construction and destruction.
// different sentry variables for construction and destruction.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment