-
- Downloads
RISC-V: Split "(a & (1UL << bitno)) ? 0 : -1" to bext + addi
For a straightforward application of bext for the following function long bext64(long a, char bitno) { return (a & (1UL << bitno)) ? 0 : -1; } we generate srl a0,a0,a1 # 7 [c=4 l=4] lshrdi3 andi a0,a0,1 # 8 [c=4 l=4] anddi3/1 addi a0,a0,-1 # 14 [c=4 l=4] adddi3/1 due to the following failed match at combine time: (set (reg:DI 82) (zero_extract:DI (reg:DI 83) (const_int 1 [0x1]) (reg:DI 84))) The existing pattern for bext requires the 3rd argument to zero_extract to be a QImode register wrapped in a zero_extension. This adds an additional pattern that allows an Xmode argument. With this change, the testcase compiles to bext a0,a0,a1 # 8 [c=4 l=4] *bextdi addi a0,a0,-1 # 14 [c=4 l=4] adddi3/1 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/bitmanip.md (*bext<mode>): Add an additional pattern that allows the 3rd argument to zero_extract to be an Xmode register operand. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bext.c: Add testcases. * gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bexti.c: Add testcases.
Showing
- gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md 12 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bext.c 20 additions, 3 deletionsgcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bext.c
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bexti.c 25 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bexti.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbs-bexti.c
0 → 100644
Please register or sign in to comment