Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5c64df80 authored by Jakub Jelinek's avatar Jakub Jelinek
Browse files

c++: Fix constexpr evaluation of SPACESHIP_EXPR [PR96497]

The following valid testcase is rejected, because cxx_eval_binary_expression
is called on the SPACESHIP_EXPR with lval = true, as the address of the
spaceship needs to be passed to a method call.
After recursing on the operands and calling genericize_spaceship which turns
it into a TARGET_EXPR with initialization, we call cxx_eval_constant_expression
on it which succeeds, but then we fall through into code that will
VERIFY_CONSTANT (r) which FAILs because it is an address of a variable.  Rather
than avoiding that for lval = true and SPACESHIP_EXPR, the patch just tail
calls cxx_eval_constant_expression - I believe that call should perform all
the needed verifications.

2020-08-10  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/96497
	* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_binary_expression): For SPACESHIP_EXPR, tail
	call cxx_eval_constant_expression after genericize_spaceship to avoid
	undesirable further VERIFY_CONSTANT.

	* g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-constexpr3.C: New test.
parent 41fd9d26
No related branches found
No related tags found
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment