contrib: Fill in HOST{CC,CFLAGS,CXX,CXXFLAGS} in test_installed
gcc/Makefile.in since my r0-60234 change fills in HOSTCC and HOSTCFLAGS in site.exp and since r8-671 also HOSTCXX and HOSTCXXFLAGS. If those variables aren't set, we get errors like: /usr/src/gcc/contrib/test_installed --without-g++ --without-gfortran --without-objc struct-layout-1.exp ... ERROR: tcl error sourcing /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp. ERROR: tcl error code TCL LOOKUP VARNAME HOSTCC ERROR: can't read "HOSTCC": no such variable while executing "remote_exec build "$HOSTCC $HOSTCFLAGS $generator_cmd"" (file "/usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp" line 96) invoked from within "source /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel #0 source /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp" invoked from within "catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name" msg" (similarly in g++ or gfortran) struct-layout-1.exp. One doesn't need to test specially for just struct-layout-1.exp alone, just not using any arg will trigger it as well, just later. The following patch fills it in as cc and c++ with empty flags to compile those, I believe that is what e.g. make uses by default, so it should be a reasonable default. We IMHO shouldn't default to GCC_UNDER_TEST because that might be a cross-compiler etc. 2024-02-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> * test_installed: Fill in HOSTCC, HOSTCXX, HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTCXXFLAGS.
Please register or sign in to comment