-
- Downloads
There was a regression for gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 for cris-elf that on...
There was a regression for gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 for cris-elf that on inspection was due to it having acquired a truncation call through the runtime. I updated that and the new tests that had "Fortran runtime error: required ftruncate or chsize support not present" messages in gfortran.log, ran past cris-elf and committed as obvious. See also <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00975.html> from which I copy-pasted most of this message. (Yep, 11 years ago.) gcc/testsuite: * gfortran.dg/dec_io_1.f90, gfortran.dg/dtio_1.f90, gfortran.dg/dtio_12.f90, gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90, gfortran.dg/namelist_89.f90: Gate test on effective_target fd_truncate. From-SVN: r271536
Showing
- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 7 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_io_1.f90 1 addition, 1 deletiongcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dec_io_1.f90
- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_1.f90 1 addition, 1 deletiongcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_1.f90
- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_12.f90 1 addition, 1 deletiongcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dtio_12.f90
- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 1 addition, 1 deletiongcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90
- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/namelist_89.f90 1 addition, 1 deletiongcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/namelist_89.f90
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment