-
- Downloads
c++: wrong ambiguity in accessing static field [PR112744]
Given struct A { constexpr static int a = 0; }; struct B : A {}; struct C : A {}; struct D : B, C {}; we give the "'A' is an ambiguous base of 'D'" error for D{}.A::a; which seems wrong: 'a' is a static data member so there is only one copy so it can be unambiguously referred to even if there are multiple A objects. clang++/MSVC/icx agree. This patch uses ba_any: [class.access.base] requires conversion to a unique base subobject for non-static data members, but it does not require that the base be unique or accessible for static data members. PR c++/112744 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck.cc (finish_class_member_access_expr): When accessing a static data member, use ba_any for lookup_base. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/lookup/scoped11.C: New test. * g++.dg/lookup/scoped12.C: New test. * g++.dg/lookup/scoped13.C: New test. * g++.dg/lookup/scoped14.C: New test. * g++.dg/lookup/scoped15.C: New test.
Showing
- gcc/cp/typeck.cc 18 additions, 3 deletionsgcc/cp/typeck.cc
- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped11.C 14 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped11.C
- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped12.C 14 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped12.C
- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped13.C 14 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped13.C
- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped14.C 14 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped14.C
- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped15.C 21 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/scoped15.C
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment