-
- Downloads
c++: -Wmissing-field-initializers in unevaluated ctx [PR98620]
This PR wants us not to warn about missing field initializers when the code in question takes places in decltype and similar. Fixed thus. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/98620 * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Don't emit -Wmissing-field-initializers warnings in unevaluated contexts. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/98620 * g++.dg/warn/Wmissing-field-initializers-2.C: New test.
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment