RISC-V: Add vwadd.wv/vwsub.wv auto-vectorization lowering optimization
1. This patch optimize the codegen of the following auto-vectorization codes: void foo (int32_t * __restrict a, int64_t * __restrict b, int64_t * __restrict c, int n) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) c[i] = (int64_t)a[i] + b[i]; } Combine instruction from: ... vsext.vf2 vadd.vv ... into: ... vwadd.wv ... Since for PLUS operation, GCC prefer the following RTL operand order when combining: (plus: (sign_extend:..) (reg:) instead of (plus: (reg:..) (sign_extend:) which is different from MINUS pattern. I split patterns of vwadd/vwsub, and add dedicated patterns for them. 2. This patch not only optimize the case as above (1) mentioned, also enhance vwadd.vv/vwsub.vv optimization for complicate PLUS/MINUS codes, consider this following codes: __attribute__ ((noipa)) void vwadd_int16_t_int8_t (int16_t *__restrict dst, int16_t *__restrict dst2, int16_t *__restrict dst3, int8_t *__restrict a, int8_t *__restrict b, int8_t *__restrict a2, int8_t *__restrict b2, int n) { for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { dst[i] = (int16_t) a[i] + (int16_t) b[i]; dst2[i] = (int16_t) a2[i] + (int16_t) b[i]; dst3[i] = (int16_t) a2[i] + (int16_t) a[i]; } } Before this patch: ... vsetvli zero,a6,e8,mf2,ta,ma vle8.v v2,0(a3) vle8.v v1,0(a4) vsetvli t1,zero,e16,m1,ta,ma vsext.vf2 v3,v2 vsext.vf2 v2,v1 vadd.vv v1,v2,v3 vsetvli zero,a6,e16,m1,ta,ma vse16.v v1,0(a0) vle8.v v4,0(a5) vsetvli t1,zero,e16,m1,ta,ma vsext.vf2 v1,v4 vadd.vv v2,v1,v2 ... After this patch: ... vsetvli zero,a6,e8,mf2,ta,ma vle8.v v3,0(a4) vle8.v v1,0(a3) vsetvli t4,zero,e8,mf2,ta,ma vwadd.vv v2,v1,v3 vsetvli zero,a6,e16,m1,ta,ma vse16.v v2,0(a0) vle8.v v2,0(a5) vsetvli t4,zero,e8,mf2,ta,ma vwadd.vv v4,v3,v2 vsetvli zero,a6,e16,m1,ta,ma vse16.v v4,0(a1) vsetvli t4,zero,e8,mf2,ta,ma sub a7,a7,a6 vwadd.vv v3,v2,v1 vsetvli zero,a6,e16,m1,ta,ma vse16.v v3,0(a2) ... The reason why current upstream GCC can not optimize codes using vwadd thoroughly is combine PASS needs intermediate RTL IR (extend one of the operand pattern (vwadd.wv)), then base on this intermediate RTL IR, extend the other operand to generate vwadd.vv. So vwadd.wv/vwsub.wv definitely helps to vwadd.vv/vwsub.vv code optimizations. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc: Change vwadd.wv/vwsub.wv intrinsic API expander * config/riscv/vector.md (@pred_single_widen_<plus_minus:optab><any_extend:su><mode>): Remove it. (@pred_single_widen_sub<any_extend:su><mode>): New pattern. (@pred_single_widen_add<any_extend:su><mode>): New pattern. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-5.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-6.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-complicate-1.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-complicate-2.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen_run-5.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen_run-6.c: New test.
Showing
- gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc 6 additions, 2 deletionsgcc/config/riscv/riscv-vector-builtins-bases.cc
- gcc/config/riscv/vector.md 25 additions, 4 deletionsgcc/config/riscv/vector.md
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-5.c 27 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-5.c
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-6.c 27 additions, 0 deletionsgcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-6.c
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-complicate-1.c 31 additions, 0 deletions...e/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-complicate-1.c
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-complicate-2.c 31 additions, 0 deletions...e/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen-complicate-2.c
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen_run-5.c 34 additions, 0 deletions...estsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen_run-5.c
- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen_run-6.c 34 additions, 0 deletions...estsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/widen/widen_run-6.c
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment