nvptx: '#define MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE 128'
... instead of 64 via 'gcc/defaults.h': MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE GET_MODE_BITSIZE (DImode) This fixes ICEs: [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -Wc++-compat (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -Wc++-compat [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++17 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++17 [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++26 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++26 [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++98 [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O0 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) [-FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -Os (test for excess errors) ..., where we ran into 'gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);' in 'gcc/internal-fn.cc:expand_fn_using_insn' for '__int128' '__builtin_clzg' etc.: during RTL pass: expand [...]/c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c: In function 'clzI': [...]/c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c:69:10: internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268 0x120ec2cf internal_error(char const*, ...) [...]/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517 0x102c7c5b fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*) [...]/gcc/diagnostic.cc:1722 0x109708eb expand_fn_using_insn [...]/gcc/internal-fn.cc:268 0x1098114f expand_internal_call(internal_fn, gcall*) [...]/gcc/internal-fn.cc:5273 0x1098114f expand_internal_call(gcall*) [...]/gcc/internal-fn.cc:5281 0x10594fc7 expand_call_stmt [...]/gcc/cfgexpand.cc:3049 [...] Likewise, as of commit e8ad697a "libstdc++: Use new type-generic built-ins in <bit> [PR118855]", the libstdc++ target library build ICEd in the same way. Additionally, this change fixes: [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/pr105094.c (test for excess errors) ..., which was: [...]/gcc.dg/pr105094.c: In function 'foo': [...]/gcc.dg/pr105094.c:11:12: error: size of variable 's' is too large And, finally, regarding 'gcc.target/nvptx/stack_frame-1.c'. Before, in 'gcc/cfgexpand.cc': 'expand_used_vars' -> 'expand_used_vars_for_block' -> 'expand_one_var' for 'ww' -> 'gcc/function.cc:use_register_for_decl' due to 'DECL_MODE (decl) == BLKmode' did 'return false;', thus -> 'add_stack_var' (even if 'ww' wasn't then actually living on the stack). Now, 'ww' has 'TImode' and 'use_register_for_decl' does 'return true;', thus -> 'expand_one_register_var', and therefore no unused stack frame emitted. gcc/ * config/nvptx/nvptx.h (MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE): '#define'. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/nvptx/stack_frame-1.c: Adjust.
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment